Reviewer Guidlines

Guidelines to the reviewers

Reviewers have the responsibility to treat the manuscript as confidential; please be aware of our Ethical

Guidelines for reviewers and authors.

Only work which meets all the criteria for publication should be recommended for acceptance.

It is essential that all research work reported in Krispon journals is well-carried out and well characterized.

There should be enough supporting evidence for the claims made in the

manuscript.

When preparing your report, please:

• comment on the originality and scientific reliability of the work;

• comment on the characterization of the compounds/materials reported - has this been accurately

interpreted and does it support the conclusions of the work; for theoretical works, please comment if

enough supporting evidence has been provided;

• state clearly whether you would like to see the article accepted or rejected and give detailed comments

(with references, as appropriate) that will both help the Editor to decide on the article and the

authors to improve it.

Please inform the Editor if:

• there is a conflict of interest

• there is a significant part of the work which you are not able to referee with confidence

• the work, or a significant part of the work, has previously been published

• you believe the work, or a significant part of the work, is currently submitted elsewhere

• the work represents part of an unduly fragmented investigation.